Bangladesh's Former Leader Sheikh Hasina Wajed Sentenced to Capital Punishment
Bangladesh's former prime minister has been handed capital punishment for human rights violations over her crackdown on student-led protests which led to her removal from power.
Sheikh Hasina was found guilty of permitting fatal actions to be used against activists, among whom around 1,400 people died during the unrest during 2024.
Legal proceedings were conducted in absentia by the special international tribunal in Bangladesh, as she resides in exile in India since she was forced from power in July 2024.
Legal authorities charged her of being the mastermind of multiple fatalities during the protests. The former leader rejected every accusation, calling the trial as "unfair and agenda-driven".
The verdict marks a critical juncture for Bangladesh, as the protests brought forth resentment over extended periods of oppression. Relatives of the deceased and harmed had called for strict sentences.
Reacting to the verdict in a detailed document, Hasina said the execution sentence was the interim government's way of "eradicating the Awami League" as a governing body and that she was content of her leadership's history on individual freedoms.
"I do not fear to confront those accusing me in a proper tribunal where the evidence can be weighed and reviewed impartially."
Bangladesh's main city, Dhaka, where the tribunal took place, was under tightened security prior to the decision on Monday, with many of Hasina's critics holding a protest and cheering as the sentence was declared.
Dhaka experienced a notable rise in turmoil, with dozens of bombs exploded and buses set on fire in the days leading up to the verdict.
One explosive incident was reported in Dhaka on Monday morning, with no casualties reported, area law enforcement officer the police spokesperson stated to media outlets.
The student-led uprising during 2024 started with calls to eliminate government job quotas but evolved into a wider anti-government movement.
UN human rights investigators said in a report in February that the approximately 1,400 deaths could amount to "human rights atrocities".
The report documented the firing at close quarters of some protesters, the intentional injuring of further participants, unwarranted detentions and mistreatment.
Disclosed sound files of one of Hasina's phone calls confirmed by media examinations earlier this year indicated she had approved the use of "fatal instruments" in July 2024. The recording was presented in court during the trial.
Prior to the ruling, family members of those who died in the demonstrations told press outlets they wanted strict consequences for Hasina.
One relative, whose sibling was killed in July 2024, said he wanted "strict sentence" for her and co-accused who have "performed revengeful deeds and misused their authority".
Lucky Akther, whose partner was fatally injured near Dhaka in August 2024, said she wanted the former leader's punishment to be "implemented before the election".
"Only then the families of those killed [in the protests] will achieve closure in their hearts."
Since Hasina's ousting, an interim government headed by economist Muhammad Yunus has assumed control. A general election is planned for February 2026.
Nonetheless, the Awami League, Hasina's political party, was prohibited by Bangladesh's interim government in May.
She alerted during the past month that if the party's candidates were prohibited from running in the imminent electoral process, millions would boycott the vote.
The judgment creates a diplomatic challenge for India and Bangladesh. The Bangladesh government has asked her repatriation but so far India has shown no willingness to agree.
The legal representative assigned to her Mohammad Amir Hossain said he was "disappointed and hoping the outcome had varied".
"I am unable to challenge because my defendants are not present; for that reason I am sad," he stated further.
Recently, the defense attorneys said they had submitted an immediate petition to the UN highlighting major judicial fairness and judicial process problems at the ICT.
The former leader faced trial together with her ex-interior minister and security forces head.
Even though the verdict provides certain resolution to relatives of the deceased in the protests, it may have minimal effect on calming the state's ideological splits.
"The anger against the former leader and the Awami League has not subsided," a human rights advocate from the capital told news organizations. "Neither she nor the party has apologised or demonstrated contrition for the fatalities of countless citizens."
The advocate declared "This creates challenges for the faction to gain approval by a bulk of the population in this nation."
The activist added that the penalty was not closure for the relatives of those fatally and non-fatally harmed.
"We support multiple individuals who underwent irreversible limb loss, they are now disabled, because of the suppression. They are incapable of excusing her."
David Bergman, a journalist and a long-time Bangladesh watcher, said the "very nature of the conviction could make it increasingly challenging" for her party to become a regular participant of the nation's political landscape again.
This may change if "an expression of regret occurs and a separation from the former leader and the previous administration," he expressed.